Further Thoughts Regarding Management of Acute Aphasia Following Stroke Holland and Fridriksson (2000) propose a “new” approach to clinical intervention for aphasia during the acute phase that is ostensibly less directive and more counseling-oriented than traditional, impairment-focused treatment. Their approach is based on results obtained from an earlier study (Holland, Swindell, & Fromm, 1983) in which aphasic patients ... Second Opinion
Second Opinion  |   February 01, 2001
Further Thoughts Regarding Management of Acute Aphasia Following Stroke
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Richard K. Peach
    Rush University and Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center, Chicago, IL
  • Contact author: Richard K. Peach, PhD, Rush University, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center, 1653 West Congress Parkway, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail: rpeach@rushu.rush.edu
Article Information
Second Opinions
Second Opinion   |   February 01, 2001
Further Thoughts Regarding Management of Acute Aphasia Following Stroke
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, February 2001, Vol. 10, 29-36. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/005)
History: Received July 26, 2000 , Accepted November 8, 2000
 
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, February 2001, Vol. 10, 29-36. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/005)
History: Received July 26, 2000; Accepted November 8, 2000
Web of Science® Times Cited: 7
Author Note
The author acknowledges the contributions of Robert T. Wertz, Stephanie Daniels, and Julie Wambaugh, who reviewed the original manuscript on which this opinion is based.
Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access