Response to Barnartt One goal of the American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is to stimulate discussion, and I am pleased that my article entitled “Planning for phonological generalization: An approach to treatment target selection” (pp. 21-27) has done just that. In this letter, I will respond to the concerns raised by Ms. Barnartt ... Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor  |   May 01, 1992
Response to Barnartt
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Thomas W. Powell
    Ball State University, Muncie, IN
Article Information
Speech, Voice & Prosodic Disorders / Attention, Memory & Executive Functions / Speech, Voice & Prosody / Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor   |   May 01, 1992
Response to Barnartt
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, May 1992, Vol. 1, 64-a-65. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0103.64b
 
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, May 1992, Vol. 1, 64-a-65. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0103.64b
One goal of the American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is to stimulate discussion, and I am pleased that my article entitled “Planning for phonological generalization: An approach to treatment target selection” (pp. 21-27) has done just that. In this letter, I will respond to the concerns raised by Ms. Barnartt about the data I presented.
My article reviewed factors that may affect selection of treatment target(s) and illustrated an individualized problem-solving approach to the setting the priorities of treatment targets using a case study format. The approach that I described emphasized the application of principles that have emerged from the experimental literature examining generalization patterns among young children with phonological disorders.
Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access