Inside Whether primarily lending our talents and interests toward teaching, research, and/or clinical service, do most of us reach a point of ceasing to question? To question the assessment procedures of our field? To question the efficacy of our treatment procedures? To question accountability as it pertains to the relationship of ... Editorial
Editorial  |   May 01, 1994
Inside
 
Author Notes
Article Information
Editorial
Editorial   |   May 01, 1994
Inside
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, May 1994, Vol. 3, 2. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0302.02
 
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, May 1994, Vol. 3, 2. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0302.02
Whether primarily lending our talents and interests toward teaching, research, and/or clinical service, do most of us reach a point of ceasing to question? To question the assessment procedures of our field?
To question the efficacy of our treatment procedures? To question accountability as it pertains to the relationship of fees for service and intervention outcomes? To question the need for change and innovation? To question the very theoretical underpinnings of our day-to-day professional enterprises? At what point can we expect to fall into a professional rut? More important, how do we prevent it? It seems to me that most of the writings in this issue lend themselves to these questions.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access