Further Thoughts Regarding Management of Acute Aphasia Following Stroke Holland and Fridriksson (2000) propose a “new” approach to clinical intervention for aphasia during the acute phase that is ostensibly less directive and more counseling-oriented than traditional, impairment-focused treatment. Their approach is based on results obtained from an earlier study (Holland, Swindell, & Fromm, 1983) in which aphasic patients ... Second Opinion
Second Opinion  |   February 01, 2001
Further Thoughts Regarding Management of Acute Aphasia Following Stroke
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Richard K. Peach
    Rush University and Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center, Chicago, IL
  • Contact author: Richard K. Peach, PhD, Rush University, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke’s Medical Center, 1653 West Congress Parkway, Chicago, IL 60612. E-mail: rpeach@rushu.rush.edu
Article Information
Second Opinions
Second Opinion   |   February 01, 2001
Further Thoughts Regarding Management of Acute Aphasia Following Stroke
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, February 2001, Vol. 10, 29-36. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/005)
History: Received July 26, 2000 , Accepted November 8, 2000
 
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, February 2001, Vol. 10, 29-36. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2001/005)
History: Received July 26, 2000; Accepted November 8, 2000
Web of Science® Times Cited: 7
Author Note
The author acknowledges the contributions of Robert T. Wertz, Stephanie Daniels, and Julie Wambaugh, who reviewed the original manuscript on which this opinion is based.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access