Response to Barnartt One goal of the American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is to stimulate discussion, and I am pleased that my article entitled “Planning for phonological generalization: An approach to treatment target selection” (pp. 21-27) has done just that. In this letter, I will respond to the concerns raised by Ms. Barnartt ... Letter to the Editor
Letter to the Editor  |   May 01, 1992
Response to Barnartt
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Thomas W. Powell
    Ball State University, Muncie, IN
Article Information
Speech, Voice & Prosodic Disorders / Attention, Memory & Executive Functions / Speech, Voice & Prosody / Letters to the Editor
Letter to the Editor   |   May 01, 1992
Response to Barnartt
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, May 1992, Vol. 1, 64-a-65. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0103.64b
 
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, May 1992, Vol. 1, 64-a-65. doi:10.1044/1058-0360.0103.64b
One goal of the American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology is to stimulate discussion, and I am pleased that my article entitled “Planning for phonological generalization: An approach to treatment target selection” (pp. 21-27) has done just that. In this letter, I will respond to the concerns raised by Ms. Barnartt about the data I presented.
My article reviewed factors that may affect selection of treatment target(s) and illustrated an individualized problem-solving approach to the setting the priorities of treatment targets using a case study format. The approach that I described emphasized the application of principles that have emerged from the experimental literature examining generalization patterns among young children with phonological disorders.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access