Research Article  |   May 2011
Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment in Moderate-to-Severe Aphasia
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Lisa A. Edmonds
    The University of Florida, Gainesville
  • Michelle Babb
    The University of Florida, Gainesville
  • Correspondence to Lisa A. Edmonds: edmonds@ufl.edu
  • Editor: Laura Justice
    Editor: Laura Justice×
  • Associate Editor: Michelle Bourgeois
    Associate Editor: Michelle Bourgeois×
Normal Language Processing / Language Disorders / Aphasia / Research Article
Research Article   |   May 2011
Effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment in Moderate-to-Severe Aphasia
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology May 2011, Vol.20, 131-145. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0036)
History: Accepted 25 Feb 2011 , Received 26 Apr 2010 , Revised 08 Sep 2010
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology May 2011, Vol.20, 131-145. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2011/10-0036)
History: Accepted 25 Feb 2011 , Received 26 Apr 2010 , Revised 08 Sep 2010

Purpose: This Phase II treatment study examined the effect of Verb Network Strengthening Treatment (VNeST) on individuals with moderate-to-severe aphasia. Research questions addressed (a) pre- to posttreatment changes and pretreatment to treatment phase changes on probe sentences containing trained verbs (e.g., “The carpenter is measuring the stairs”) and semantically related untrained verbs (e.g., “The nurse is weighing the baby”); (b) lexical retrieval changes in single-word naming, sentence, and discourse measures; (c) functional communication by way of proxy and participant report; and (d) error evolution.

Method: A multiple-baseline approach across participants was used. Effect sizes were calculated for pre- and posttreatment and maintenance probe responses. A C statistic was used to determine changes from the baseline to treatment phases.

Results: One participant exhibited improvement on all generalization measures, whereas the other participant exhibited more limited generalization. Both participants showed improvement on the functional communication measure.

Conclusions: As predicted, the participants did not show the same extent of improvement that was observed in participants with more moderate aphasia (Edmonds, Nadeu, & Kiran, 2009). Nonetheless, the findings suggest that VNeST may be appropriate for persons with moderate-to-severe aphasia, especially with a small adaptation to the treatment protocol that will be retained for future iterations of VNeST.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Development of a Theoretically Based Treatment for Sentence Comprehension Deficits in Individuals With Aphasia
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology May 2012, Vol.21, S88-S102. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0106)
The Role of Syntactic Complexity in Treatment of Sentence Deficits in Agrammatic Aphasia
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research June 2003, Vol.46, 591-607. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2003/047)
An Analysis of Aphasic Naming Errors as an Indicator of Improved Linguistic Processing Following Phonomotor Treatment
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology May 2013, Vol.22, S240-S249. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0078)
Constrained Versus Unconstrained Intensive Language Therapy in Two Individuals With Chronic, Moderate-to-Severe Aphasia and Apraxia of Speech: Behavioral and fMRI Outcomes
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology May 2012, Vol.21, S65-S87. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0113)
Typicality Treatment for Naming Deficits in Aphasia: Why Does It Work?
SIG 2 Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenic Speech and Language Disorders April 2008, Vol.18, 6-14. doi:10.1044/nnsld18.1.6