Dialogos A scan of the Table of Contents will reveal that nearly half of the articles in this issue are exchanges between two or more scientists in the form of Letters to the Editor (and Responses) and a Second Opinion piece. A Letter to the Editor is a mechanism that ... Editorial
Editorial  |   February 01, 2007
Dialogos
 
Author Notes
  • Jeannette D. HoitEditor
Article Information
Editorial
Editorial   |   February 01, 2007
Dialogos
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, February 2007, Vol. 16, 2. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2007/001)
 
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, February 2007, Vol. 16, 2. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2007/001)
A scan of the Table of Contents will reveal that nearly half of the articles in this issue are exchanges between two or more scientists in the form of Letters to the Editor (and Responses) and a Second Opinion piece.
A Letter to the Editor is a mechanism that allows readers to critique published work and allows the authors of that work to respond. In this issue of AJSLP, there are two sets of Letters to the Editor. One is concerned with the nature and quality of the science underlying certain forms of treatment for people who stutter, and the other is concerned with scoring procedures used in the evaluation of clients with aphasia.
First Page Preview
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview ×
View Large
Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access