Research  |   November 2009
Evidence-Based Systematic Review: Effects of Nonspeech Oral Motor Exercises on Speech
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Rebecca J. McCauley
    The Ohio State University, Columbus
  • Edythe Strand
    Mayo Clinic and Mayo College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
  • Gregory L. Lof
    MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston
  • Tobi Frymark
    American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, MD
  • Contact author: Tracy Schooling, National Center for Evidence-Based Practice in Communication Disorders, American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2200 Research Boulevard #245, Rockville, MD 20850-3289. E-mail: tschooling@asha.org.
Speech, Voice & Prosodic Disorders / Research Issues, Methods & Evidence-Based Practice / Speech, Voice & Prosody
Research   |   November 2009
Evidence-Based Systematic Review: Effects of Nonspeech Oral Motor Exercises on Speech
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology November 2009, Vol.18, 343-360. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0006)
History: Accepted 08 May 2009 , Received 21 Jan 2009
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology November 2009, Vol.18, 343-360. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/09-0006)
History: Accepted 08 May 2009 , Received 21 Jan 2009

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the current evidence for the use of oral motor exercises (OMEs) on speech (i.e., speech physiology, speech production, and functional speech outcomes) as a means of supporting further research and clinicians' use of evidence-based practice.

Method: The peer-reviewed literature from 1960 to 2007 was searched for articles examining the use of OMEs to affect speech physiology, production, or functional outcomes (i.e., intelligibility). Articles that met selection criteria were appraised by 2 reviewers and vetted by a 3rd for methodological quality, then characterized as efficacy or exploratory studies.

Results: Fifteen studies met inclusion criteria; of these, 8 included data relevant to the effects of OMEs on speech physiology, 8 on speech production, and 8 on functional speech outcomes. Considerable variation was noted in the participants, interventions, and treatment schedules. The critical appraisals identified significant weaknesses in almost all studies.

Conclusions: Insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of OMEs to produce effects on speech was found in the research literature. Discussion is largely confined to a consideration of the need for more well-designed studies using well-described participant groups and alternative bases for evidence-based practice.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access

Related Articles

Evidence-Based Systematic Review: Effects of Oral Motor Interventions on Feeding and Swallowing in Preterm Infants
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology November 2010, Vol.19, 321-340. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2010/09-0067)
The Application of Evidence-Based Practice to Nonspeech Oral Motor Treatments
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools July 2008, Vol.39, 408-421. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2008/038)
Evidence-Based Systematic Review: Effects of Different Service Delivery Models on Communication Outcomes for Elementary School–Age Children
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools July 2010, Vol.41, 233-264. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0128)
A Nationwide Survey of Nonspeech Oral Motor Exercise Use: Implications for Evidence-Based Practice
Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools July 2008, Vol.39, 392-407. doi:10.1044/0161-1461(2008/037)
Editor’s Corner
SIG 13 Perspectives on Swallowing and Swallowing Disorders (Dysphagia) November 2013, Vol.22, 83-84. doi:10.1044/sasd22.3.83