Experienced Speech-Language Pathologists' Responses to Ethical Dilemmas: An Integrated Approach to Ethical Reasoning PurposeTo investigate the approaches of experienced speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to ethical reasoning and the processes they use to resolve ethical dilemmas.MethodTen experienced SLPs participated in in-depth interviews. A narrative approach was used to guide participants' descriptions of how they resolved ethical dilemmas. Individual narrative transcriptions were analyzed by using the ... Research
Research  |   May 2010
Experienced Speech-Language Pathologists' Responses to Ethical Dilemmas: An Integrated Approach to Ethical Reasoning
 
Author Affiliations & Notes
  • Belinda Kenny
    University of Sydney, Australia
  • Michelle Lincoln
    University of Sydney, Australia
  • Susan Balandin
    Molde University College, Norway
  • Contact author: Belinda Kenny, University of Sydney—Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cumberland Campus, Lidcombe, New South Wales 1825, Australia. E-mail: b.kenny@usyd.edu.au.
  • © 2010 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association
Article Information
Professional Issues & Training
Research   |   May 2010
Experienced Speech-Language Pathologists' Responses to Ethical Dilemmas: An Integrated Approach to Ethical Reasoning
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, May 2010, Vol. 19, 121-134. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0007)
History: Received February 17, 2008 , Revised August 19, 2008 , Accepted October 11, 2009
 
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, May 2010, Vol. 19, 121-134. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2009/08-0007)
History: Received February 17, 2008; Revised August 19, 2008; Accepted October 11, 2009
Web of Science® Times Cited: 5

PurposeTo investigate the approaches of experienced speech-language pathologists (SLPs) to ethical reasoning and the processes they use to resolve ethical dilemmas.

MethodTen experienced SLPs participated in in-depth interviews. A narrative approach was used to guide participants' descriptions of how they resolved ethical dilemmas. Individual narrative transcriptions were analyzed by using the participant’s words to develop an ethical story that described and interpreted their responses to dilemmas. Key concepts from individual stories were then coded into group themes to reflect participants' reasoning processes.

ResultsFive major themes reflected participants' approaches to ethical reasoning: (a) focusing on the well-being of the client, (b) fulfilling professional roles and responsibilities, (c) attending to professional relationships, (d) managing resources, and (e) integrating personal and professional values. SLPs demonstrated a range of ethical reasoning processes: applying bioethical principles, casuistry, and narrative reasoning when managing ethical dilemmas in the workplace.

ConclusionsThe results indicate that experienced SLPs adopted an integrated approach to ethical reasoning. They supported clients' rights to make health care choices. Bioethical principles, casuistry, and narrative reasoning provided useful frameworks for facilitating health professionals' application of codes of ethics to complex professional practice issues.

Order a Subscription
Pay Per View
Entire American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology content & archive
24-hour access
This Article
24-hour access